NOVA Tax Research Lab · January 2025
The Fall of the Banking Sector Solidarity Surcharge
José Avilez OgandoRecent Judgments 477/2025 and 478/2025 from the Constitutional Court, which declared the Banking Sector Solidarity Surcharge (BSSS) unconstitutional with general binding force, represent a victory for fiscal justice. They serve as a clear example of the nullity of tax acts performed under that regime, as they are fundamentally flawed by:
Complete absence of a taxable event: The retroactive effect of the declaration of unconstitutionality eliminates the norm from its inception. Without a valid law, the legal link vanishes, and the assessments effectively certify legally non-existent facts.
Total lack of legal basis: By claiming a tax obligation without any valid normative support, the act creates pecuniary obligations not provided for by law.
Violation of the essential core of a fundamental right: The declaration of unconstitutionality is grounded in violations of Article 103(3) of the Portuguese Constitution (CRP), affecting the essential core of a fundamental right of an analogous nature (Article 17 CRP) to constitutionally adequate taxation.
Practical consequences: Nullity can be invoked at any time and recognized by any authority. A null act neither consolidates nor produces any legal effects; enforcement acts are unlawful material operations requiring full restitution of amounts unduly paid, plus compensatory interest for error attributable to the services.
For a more detailed analysis of the nullity regime applicable to these tax acts, see the LinkedIn post at lnkd.in/eG8K9jV6 lnkd.in/eG8K9jV6